Answer:
its sutras dharma and enlightenment
Explanation:
trust me if its right pls give me brianliest
Explanation:
The best way is to give the environment over entirely to the fossil-fuel industry to exploit for its “needs.” The horrific human arrogance that holds that our species has “dominion” over the Earth has produced the worst catastrophe in human history. So please, go ahead and continue to believe that “man” can and should “adapt the environment to his needs.” We are doomed now, since governments have been reluctant to act to reduce fossil-fuel use. WE are not - repeat: NOT - the only forms of life on the planet. Moreover, contrary to the wicked pronouncements of religions, especially Christianity, WE do not - repeat, NOT - have “dominion” over the Earth. Hope that answer is satisfactory for this question. If not, please go to the Internet and watch videos of California in flames, Bangladesh in strangling floods, and do read the last article of Bill McKibben, one of the great climate-change journalists in the world, and see that we are now going over the cliff, thanks to the monstrous Republican regime in the US, with the aid of other countries, to extinction. It is not so much that WE matter. There are many other species on Earth and human beings have succeeded now in wiping out 60 percent of them.
The answer to your question is A. "Others weren't so lucky. In the rush and panic, a number of people either lost their footing or were accidentally pushed from the sidewalk and into the busy street."
Answer: Economic imperative
Explanation: The economic imperative is, in fact, changeable, and it is a set of principles that governs the company in order to achieve the best possible strategy in the market. This is therefore a principle that changes as market conditions change, in line with the needs of the market, that is, customers. Thus, the business strategy changes from the national to the global level, in parallel with changes in cultural values and time. Thus, with these changes, the economic imperative is also changing in order to make a profit, so the company is also guided by the needs of both the national and global market, together with the conditions and trends of the time and consumer culture of the time.
So Russ is guided by the company's policies, that is, his economic imperative travels the world to present his company's products as a seller globally. This means the trend of time and consumer culture and values are such that according to the products of his company he sells, he has to travel globally.
Answer:
The three primary stakeholders are the banks, the merchants, and the consumers.
Banks = Against, since this would mean that they will be receiving less
Merchants = For, since they would be paying less
Consumers = Generally unaffected. But I believe they would be more against the proposal because if interchange fees are capped, then the banks will find other ways to retrieve the lost revenues by other means, such as increasing the interest or etc.
