<span>I had a question like this various Economics classes, as part of producer theory, trade, and overall economic growth. So I hope this translates to History as well.
The answer is C) Specialization leads to interdependence.
Why? If a country (or region, or industry) specializes in producing one thing, they will need to trade in order to get the other things they need.
A and D both go against this logic and are wrong. Specialization means picking something you are good at (producing at a lower price than others), and using all your resources for it.
B is probably wrong because it just seems silly. Not everyone will get rich. That's also part of Economics - there are ups and downs in the economy, there will always be some unemployment, etc.</span>
I believe the answer is: 70%
The number come after accumulating the number of earning from each gender and divided it to the number of population that each gender has.
After the division, it's calculated that the median earning for men tend to be 23% higher compared to women's median earning
<span>This will usually lead to a good rapport with customers who are wanting to be socially conscious. Taking a stand that is in concert with these customers' wishes will do nothing but help a company be seen as socially and culturally-progressive. This will give the impression that the company actually cares about their customers instead of simply looking at the bottom line.</span>
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
But it was also intended to send a message to the Soviets. Ever since America dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945, the question has persisted: Was that magnitude of death and destruction really needed to end World War II? American leadership apparently thought so.
