1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
9

Why did Washington consider it important to put down the Whiskey Rebellion?

History
1 answer:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
6 0
<span>Washington considered it important to put down the Whiskey Rebellion, because if he didn't, it might undermine the new government and weaken its authority.</span>
You might be interested in
What was the effect of plessy v. ferguson in the united statess?
FrozenT [24]
It caused the separate but equal. Everything the whites had the blacks had too. If the whites got a school then the blacks did too. If the whites had a dining area the blacks did too. I really don't mean to sound racist. I just don't know how else to explain it. 
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following properties is not a characteristic of bronze?
Paraphin [41]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

<h3 /><h3 /><h3 /><h3 /><h3>D. It is easy to resharpen.</h3>
8 0
2 years ago
A major result of the Homestead Strike (1892) was
ohaa [14]

Answer:

d..........................

8 0
3 years ago
Need help with these, thanks.
denis-greek [22]
The Boston tea party was a protest and an action of the colonies for displaying their rebellious spirit. Therefore, king George must have felt conflictThe Boston tea party’s purpose was to display the rebellious spirit of the colonies. Therefore, king George must have felt conflicted
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following articles from the Constitution could be used to effectively argue in favor of judicial review?
masha68 [24]

Answer:

4. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.

Explanation:

Number 4 is the best option that argues in favor of judicial review as it holds that the judicial's power should extend to ALL cases, in law and equity, under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the nation. Many interpret it to mean that the Judicial, then, has the power to review the actions of the Legislative and the Executive in case they do not comply with the law.

For example, if the legislative branch enacts a law that is not consistent with the Constitution (like a law that establishes a religion) the Supreme Court has the power to review it and declare it unconstitutional as it goes against the first amendment; and if the President were to start collecting taxes (which it is not one of their functions), the Supreme Court would also have the power to declare such act unconstitutional.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe the migration to south Texas in early 1990.
    9·1 answer
  • What were the 3 requests made by the boycott
    10·2 answers
  • The role of a campaign manager is to
    6·2 answers
  • Who was alexander the great why is he important?
    5·1 answer
  • Which was developed specifically during California’s Gold Rush?
    12·2 answers
  • How did toussaint louverture affect the haitian revolution apex
    14·1 answer
  • UN experts concluded that Iraq had ________ in 1991 after its Desert Storm defeat, but officials in U.S. president George W. Bus
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following choices is an example of graft?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help! I NEED A ANSWER ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • En 1830, en Francia, una revolución liberal puso fin a la monarquía de Carlos X e instauró en el trono a Luis Felipe de Orleans,
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!