Francesco Redi performed his experiment against the theory of spontaneous generation. In his experiment, he takes one glass jar and a piece of flesh and analyzes them in three different situations.
<h3>Why did Francesco Redi perform his glass jar experiment?</h3>
Francesco Redi performed his glass jar experiment in order to illustrate the evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
He demonstrate that dead maggots or flies would not generate new flies when positioned on rotting flesh in a sealed jar, whereas live maggots or flies would have the capability to grow some eggs of maggots.
This experiment discredited both the presence of some essential components in once-living organisms and the requirement of fresh air to induce living life.
The complete question is as follows:
Which choice best summarizes the outcome of Redi‘s experiment?
- Evidence for the theory of spontaneous generation.
- Evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
- Evidence for the theory of special creation.
- Evidence for the theory of the origin of life.
Therefore, the correct option is B, i.e. Evidence against the theory of spontaneous generation.
To learn more about Francesco Redi's experiment, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/2776384
#SPJ1
1.
I would say individual biodiversity. I have read that there are variations in genes so genetic variation is a biodiversity along with species diversity and ecosystem biodiversity. In fact, genetic diversity is similar to species diversity. Species have their own genetic variation.
2.
True. We are losing biodiversity at a higher rate than ever before.
The dependent variable will change so the answer is 4 the amount of protein digested because it will change based off other things in the lab.
