Answer:
The main way to make this argument is to say that it is exceedingly difficult for the government to determine what constitutes an unfair job. This is something that is beyond the ability of the government to judge.
It is one thing for the government to protect workers from things like unsafe jobs. It is much more possible to decide in an objective way what jobs are unsafe. We can look at things like workplace injuries and deaths and say that a job is unsafe. It is also clear that workers should not be subjected to unsafe conditions while at work.
By contrast, things are very much more difficult when it comes to the issue of fairness. There is no objective way to determine (for example) whether it is unfair for a fast food restaurant in New York City to pay its employees $8.00 per hour after they have been working there 2 or 3 years.
Because of such issues, it does not make sense for the government to protect workers from unfair jobs. It is simply impossible to determine what jobs are unfair when it comes to things like wages or opportunities for advancement. Therefore, (we can argue) the government should not try to make these decisions.
Answer:
the constitution outlined how this government would function
Explanation:
They did not believe the government had the authority to collect taxes
The Great Compromise solved the issue of representation by putting the ideas of large(Virginia) states and small( New Jersey) states together. This compromise started off by keeping a two house Congress which were the House of Representatives and the Senate. The House of Representatives came from the large states plan, and the Senate came from the small states plan. The first house represented the people, and it involved a number of representatives based on population of the state. The second house represented the states, and each of the states will have two senators that were elected by their legislature which constructed equal representation.
