One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
Answer:
descriptive correlational study
Explanation:
According to my research on the different types of research methods, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the researcher would use a descriptive correlational study in this situation. This research method is a study in which the researcher is primarily interested in describing relationships among variables, without seeking to establish a causal connection or modify any variable.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Muslims vary sharply in their interpretations of traditions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
Please mark me as Brainlineast.
Answer: One of the greatest challenges in Mesoamerica for farmers is the lack of usable land, and the poor condition of the soil
Explanation:
According to the Divine Command Theory, whatever the situation, if we do what God wills, then we do the right thing; if we do not do what God wills, then, no matter what the result is, we do wrong.
<h3>
What is Divine Command Theory?</h3>
- Theological voluntarism (also known as divine command theory) is a meta-ethical theory that posits that an action's morality is identical to whether it is commanded by God.
- According to the view, what is moral is decided by God's commands, and for a person to be moral, he must obey God's commands.
- In ancient and modern times, followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions have frequently embraced the value of God's precepts in developing morality.
- According to the Divine Command Theory, whatever the scenario, if we do what God wills, we do the right thing; if we do not do what God wills, we do evil, regardless of the outcome.
Therefore, according to the Divine Command Theory, whatever the situation, if we do what God wills, then we do the right thing; if we do not do what God wills, then, no matter what the result is, we do wrong.
Know more about divine community here:
brainly.com/question/26637674
#SPJ4