According to Malthusian theory of population, population increases in a geometrical ratio, whereas food supply increases in an arithmetic ratio. This disharmony would lead to widespread poverty and starvation, which would only be checked by natural occurrences such as disease, high infant mortality, famine, war or moral restraint. His main contribution is in the agricultural sector. According to this theory there are two steps to control the population: preventative and positive checks. Preventative means control in birth rate, and uses of different methods to control birth; and positive checks means natural calamities, war, etc. His theory was wrong because Malthus only considered two factors when he established his basic graph: food supply and population growth. Other factors such as improvements in technology proved him wrong. He was right at his time but development made him wrong. If it wasn't for outside influences on population growth and food supply, his mathematical reasoning which proved his theory and was right. I HOPED THIS HELPED
I don't know limited and unlimited countries, but this is something that you often say of government: a limited government must obey some kind of rule, while an unlimited government is an absolute government and is free to do everything (including kill its subjects)
<span />
Answer:
interdependence and individual rights.
Explanation:
The basis for organic solidarity is based on the notion of interdependece between individuals ,
According to Durkheim
"Organic solidarity turns into social cohesion as individuals rely more on each other "
Contrasted to Mechanical solidarity, where primitive societies or prior to industrialization show less dependence for a lack of specialized work:
The nomadic or hunting tribes, the typical example (mechanical solidarity)
With industrialization, specialization of work and the complementarities between people turn to the basis of organic solidarity.
Industrial societies (UK, Germany are historical examples)
