Answer:
Adler believed that each individual has the ability to change his/her life at any time through the<u> </u><u>Social Interest.</u>
Explanation:
Alfred Adler: He was a psychologist and a physician, who developed the Adlerian psychology, also known as individual psychology.
- <u> "Social interest":</u>
According to Adler any individual can make a positive impact in the society and improve his status at any time, if he increase his or her capacity to be more social and share more ideas relating things.
<em>As it will increase the sense of cooperation inside a community and enhances ones ability to be more interested in the activities inside a community.</em>
Answer: About the beginning of the Common Era, Indian merchants may have settled there, bringing Brahmans and Buddhist monks with them. These religious men were patronized by rulers who converted to Hinduism or Buddhism. Later, from the 9th century onward, Tantrism, both Hindu and Buddhist, spread throughout the region.
Explanation:
Answer:
33% is about how many people who smoke will develop lung cancer over their lifetimes. And that comes with great variability and does not account for other smoking related illness. What would the data using a preliminary estimate of .33 be measuring exaxctly?
Answer:
Forming subgoals
Explanation:
When dealing with a complex task with many elements it is always easier to seperate each activity in order to acheive the final goal. The spliting of the activities is called the formation of subgoals. A subgoal is a goal that with completion, completes a part of the final goal.
It makes it easier as the final goal can be seen as the summation of the subgoals. The completion of a subgoal also motivates a person as they are a step closer to the final goal.
Hence, Ashley splits her goal of installing a spare tire into individual elements called subgoals.
The answer is true. As stated by Hagan, “As mothers gain power comparative to husbands, daughters gain liberty relative to sons.” Over the egalitarian family structure, daughters are understood as more equal and can go in the workforce. Since not as much of control is applied on the daughter in the egalitarian family, they are given more possibility to take part in delinquent behavior, just as the sons are in patriarchal families. But, boys are still more probable to get involve in dangerous behavior. And the opposite of this goes to the patriarchal structure.
