A. When it directly relates to all parts of an idea
Answer:
She had just been informed that a surgical operation needed to be carried out on her husband who had been critically ill and bedridden.
Explanation:
Gopal"s wife had just been informed that a surgical operation needed to be carried out on her husband who had been critically ill and bedridden for about one and half months.
This was the verdict of Dr Raman, Gopal's long-term friend, whose frankness and openness had earned him a reputation of being truthful.
Hence if Dr Raman said it, then it must be true.
Hence Dr Raman's verdict of the need to carry out an urgent operation on Gopal, in addition to the strain of protracted caring for her husband, was too much for Gopal's wife to bear, weakened her and made her to collapse on the floor.
If I was in this position I would say people should vote me as president because I'm a leader and I put people's needs first ahead of my own and care for my school or country. If this was in school I would say, if u vote for me I will remove homework, have better cafeteria food, have fun each day, and add vending machines. If you vote for me I would fulfill all my promises and help you out in any way I can. If this was a literal election I would say, I would make this earth a better place, enforce the law more, so no more crime, no more needs to worry, better life support and insurance, better homes for the homeless and orphanage, and also equal rights for every person equally. I would make this earth better and put your needs ahead of my own and help you guys. That's honestly what I would say if I was in the position, I hope it helps you. I want to be president so I can make a change in people's lives and my qualities, well this is my first time running for president so I could say this is a new experience and I'm patient with others, gifted with doing taxes, trustworthy and known to honor my word, and I am a citizen on the US. I also believe in a better future for this earth, that peace will be among people one day and what I want to change, is the crime and the rights, everyone should have equal rights and there should not be crime at all, so I want to change laws and enforce them, littering would be a fine of $100 because you're basically disrespecting and trashing this earth making it look like a wasteland, and I would not force people to do jury duty, I would ask for volunteers instead, and in car accidents, if say for ex person one is crashed by person 2, I would not charge person one for his car even though he was the victim, I would rather force person 2 to pay for the coverages for person 1.
.
What are we supposed to be solving here
Answer:
She believes that an individual can either give full attention to a task or stop taking it because giving it partial attention does not make meaning. To prove her argument, Goodman uses the example of a five-year-old child with too much sugar in his body yet he is taking more than one task, thanks to technology.
In this case, the child crashes and falls into a deep sleep due to exhaustion, which displays the negative impact of technology. This example presents the idea that the ability to slow things down and focus on a given task at a time is a human virtue that should be emulated.
In addition, Goodman expresses her disappointment in her letter, which results from her observation that modern people are caught up with little devices and computers such that they forget their personalities and emotions.
She is disappointed because most people in the modern society have allowed technology to take control of their lives, while snail mail and its meanings are quickly fading away. Due to lack of authenticity in communication, the world is quickly falling apart.Explanation:
In her opening paragraphs, the author uses the framing device as an anecdote setting, which helps her to outline and set the mood for the entire argument. Goodman believes that handwritten letters are authentic and sentimental compared to emails.
Communication than handwritten letter, the author attempts to show that the same technology tears people apart because individuals do not mean what they say when communicating through these technologies.
From her experience, Goodman says that lack of meaning and truthfulness in communication through technologies is common because people tend to do things fast without giving much thought to what they are doing. She argues that this is due to human inability to giver partial attention to a given task.
