Jane Elliott's experience is efficient in showing how degrading racism is and is carried out without valid reasons.
Based on this, we can answer the other questions as follows:
- The experiment can identify how racism is active in society in direct and indirect ways.
- The methods used in the experiment stimulate feelings of intimidation and humiliation, showing people how degrading racism is for those who suffer.
- Racism can be alleviated with equality policies, punishment for people who promote racist behavior, and better education about issues and race.
<h3>What was Jane Elliott's experiment?</h3>
Elliott organized his experiment on a group of people with different eye colors. People with light eyes would be treated with disrespect and would spend hours standing in a line, without care, and in an uncomfortable environment. People with dark eyes, on the other hand, would be treated kindly, be seated in a comfortable place, and eat donuts while waiting to be served.
The blue-eyed people were being treated in a racist way and this showed how much racism is humiliating, intimidating, degrading, and depressing, as they felt very bad about the way they were treated, even though they suffered racism indirectly. These feelings were provoked to show how much racism is harmful and intensely hurts people.
Learn more about racism at the link:
brainly.com/question/23754542
#SPJ1
 
        
             
        
        
        
A problem I have with someone is arguing and we do it all the time but I'm trying to stop. I can take care easily my stress it goes away quickly.
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
i think real im sorry if i got it wrong 
have a nice day
Explanation:
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Theroux’s points are all accurate to this day. He presents certain objectives that are still presented today among women and men. Specifically, Theroux utilizes factors such as ‘ In a sense, little girls are traditionally urged to please adults with a kind of coquettishness, while boys are enjoined to behave like monkeys towards each other. The nine year old coquette proceeds to become womanish in a subtle power game in which she learns to be sexually indispensable, socially decorative and always alert to a man’s sense of inadequacy’ and ‘Femininity — being ladylike — implies needing a man as witness and seducer; but masculinity celebrates the exclusive company of men. That is why it is so grotesque; and that is also why there is no manliness without inadequacy — because it denies men the natural friendship of women.’ This evidence depicts how even in the present day, his theories among both genders continue to remain accurate.
Explanation:
Theroux’s points are all accurate to this day. He presents certain objectives that are still presented today among women and men. Specifically, Theroux utilizes factors such as ‘ In a sense, little girls are traditionally urged to please adults with a kind of coquettishness, while boys are enjoined to behave like monkeys towards each other. The nine year old coquette proceeds to become womanish in a subtle power game in which she learns to be sexually indispensable, socially decorative and always alert to a man’s sense of inadequacy’ and ‘Femininity — being ladylike — implies needing a man as witness and seducer; but masculinity celebrates the exclusive company of men. That is why it is so grotesque; and that is also why there is no manliness without inadequacy — because it denies men the natural friendship of women.’ This evidence depicts how even in the present day, his theories among both genders continue to remain accurate.