1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artyom0805 [142]
3 years ago
14

Following the election of 1860, many in the South believed that secession could A. still be avoided.

History
2 answers:
BartSMP [9]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer for the question is B
krek1111 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

I got it right just now

You might be interested in
What was the first beer to be available in cans, beginning on this day in 1935?
oee [108]
By the end of the 19th century, canned goods were becoming popularized largely through the use industrialization which accelerated mass acceleration and distribution of manufactured products. It wasn't however, until after prohibition ended was selling alcoholic products made doable again.

The first beer to be made available in cans was conducted by the Gottfried Krueger Brewing Company based out of Richmond Virginia in early in 1935. A sample size of 2000 cans were distributed with an approval rating over 90% by those who tried the canned beer. Earlier attempts were made before prohibition in 1909, but Gottfried Krueger succeeded because they found a way to prevent the beer from chemically mixing with the tin. They also succeeded in comparison to bottles because canned beverages did not require a deposit to be paid by the patron that a bottle required, and were easier for storage as well as easier to cool due to the tin material. 

The canned beer introduction skyrocketed, with other brewing companies taking into account of the canned beer's success and creating their own canned beer products to meet the new craze. Today, canned beers may be found in practically every store that sells alcohol and continue to be popular drinks of choice for those today.
6 0
4 years ago
Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?
scZoUnD [109]

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


4 0
4 years ago
Despite criticism of the treaty upon his return from Paris, president Woodrow
Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer: C) insisted that the treaty be accepted without any changes

Explanation:

There was a lot of criticism and opposition to the Treaty of Versailles from the American public as well as Republican leaders who felt that the ''League of Nations'' provision might be a threat to American independence.

Henry Cabot Lodge, the principal Republican senator, made changes to the treaty that President Wilson told his party to refuse. In insisting that the treaty be accepted with no changes, it was not passed and the failure to pass it meant that the U.S. did not join the League of Nations.

5 0
3 years ago
President Truman discusses two different ways of life in this excerpt. What do you think he means by this? Do you agree with Pre
Oxana [17]

Answer: Answer and explanation #1

President Harry Truman talks about "two ways of life" in a speech to Congress in 1947.

When Truman talks about two ways of life he calls them one "free" and other "totalitarian". By this time the term totalitarianism had already become famous to classify extremely authoritarian regimes like the nazi and soviet regimes.

Thus the president can only be referring to the opposition between capitalist and communist economic systems represented by the US and Soviet Union.

To answer if you agree with President Truman's argument you should ask yourself a few questions: was the US back then a regime that really followed the will of the majority? how was the US back then? how was the USSR? how did political persecution work there? was it really impossible to both systems to exist in the world? In short, you must check Truman's arguments to see if you agree or disagree with them.

Answer and explanation #2

Most historians agree that this speech was a declaration of the Cold War. It was given when the US saw that the USSR could amplify its influence on Western Europe and Africa: Truman spoke to Congress to get approval to financially aid Turkey and Greece regimes against leftist groups supported by the USSR.

So we see in this speech the entire framing of the Cold War: a war that was not fought directly but rather by securing influence zones. This speech was the beginning of the Truman Doctrine: it started the Containment Policy which compromised to stop the spreading of communism to other areas of the world other than the USSR.  

What Truman started in this speech was the modus operandi of the Cold War until its end in the late 20th century.

Explanation: if this is wrong i’m sorry and plz mar brainlist

3 0
3 years ago
How did the invention of the cotton gin impact George’s economy
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

The economic impact of Whitney's gin was vast; after its invention, the yield of raw cotton nearly doubled each decade after 1800. ... The demand for Georgia's cotton grew as new inventions such as spinning jennies and steamboats were able to weave and transport more of the crop.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did President Lincoln risk if he chose not to resupply Fort Sumter?
    14·1 answer
  • In the above passage, emerson is critical of which act as being "this filthy enactment"?
    7·1 answer
  • How did Hippocrates differ from Herodotus?
    6·2 answers
  • Who was the 27 preisdent​
    6·1 answer
  • In ancient Persia, messages could be sent rapidly because of an excellent system of:
    10·2 answers
  • Which event in 2011 was cause for celebration in the united states?
    13·1 answer
  • What party formed to limit slavery in the west?
    9·2 answers
  • A citizen group wants to build a new youth center. Most residents support the idea. City leaders have suggested using existing l
    8·1 answer
  • What was the first president name
    11·2 answers
  • The passage suggests that, compared to the final result, the original idea for Mount Rushmore ..A)was dreamt by Calvin Coolidge
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!