The long-term impact of Martin Luther's break from the Catholic Church was the division of Christianity into many factions and groups. We see many Protestant churches today as a result of his "revolution."
Luther had not intended to break away from the Roman Catholic Church; he wanted to reform it and restore it to what he saw as a proper foundation on the Bible. But Rome did not agree with him, and ultimately a new church, the Lutheran Church, formed. There also were other Protestant reformers, and other new churches developed from their teachings and influence.
Another point might be made: Luther emphasized the individual's freedom of conscience to believe what he thought the Word of God was saying. Though Luther did not intend it as a political movement, this began thoughts in the direction of freedom of speech and conscience in social life. The historian Philip Schaff has said that the Reformation "marks the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of modern times. Starting from religion, it gave, directly or indirectly, a mighty impulse to every forward movement, and made Protestantism the chief propelling force in the history of modern civilization."
For more details on Schaff's point, read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/11464108#readmore
The factor that increased is "Legislation that removed unfair electoral requirements"
In 1960 only 5% of African Americans were registered to vote
No, generally speaking <span>African Americans would not have been eager to fight for the United States during the Spanish American War, since they were treated with such disrespect by white Americans, who started the war in the first place. </span>
<span>One
type of proposed land conservation is identifying watersheds across Texas state
where it is feasible to implement brush control in order to enhance public water supplies.
This is aimed at enhancing water yield, conserve water lost to
evapotranspiration, recharge ground water and aquifers etc.</span>
In this case, the doctrine the court was applying is the rule of reason.According to this judicial doctrine of antitrust law, it is a violation to take any action that will put an unreasonable restraint on trade.
