Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
Answer:
The only option that describes a major outcome of President Bill clinton's impeachment is:
b) Many americas lsot trust in government officials
Explanation:
The reasons behind this are: Clinton received 70% of approval to continue his job as president. Also, the popularity of republicans fell and it guided the next elections to choose a democrat. Furthermore, He wasn't jailed and retired from office. He just only owns the loss of trust from the public.
The three major rivers of india are orginated in himalaya mountains
Land needed to be cleared for farming,and since deforestation is already a problem.
Answer:
Most likely!
Explanation:
The French Revolution was mainly started due to the nobility:
- Ignoring the needs of the peasants.
- Spending all of the nations income on there lavish life styles and partys.
- The French Monarchy's approval rate among its citizens have always been poor, but when King Louis The XVI (Louis The 16)
If the French Nobility took more steps and showed more effort that they are trying to do the best for the people, the revolution may of never happened!
