for cases heard by the supreme court, which do you think is more important, the brief or the oral argument? why?

1 answer:

6 0

A written brief in Supreme Court is much superior compared to an oral argument. A written brief proves to be the primary document from which a judge reads and understands the case. A brief is something which can be carried handy and can be used for future references.

A brief needs to be thoroughly reviewed and edited until it provides the clear outline of the case.

An oral argument can be at times too persuasive that it may bias or influence the minds of the judges and also the attorneys must be well prepared and not deviate from their defense while they present the argument.

You might be interested in

Unit 6 imperialism from 1750 to 1900 graphic organizer in

lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

What does the Europeans want from these countries? Raw Materials. Why? During that time Great Britain industrial revolution was going on. You need raw materials like Iron to create products to sell. Boost europeans economy, so they exploit other countries.

How? Most common strategy they use was Divide and Conquer. They divide the country up, make them fight each other. Then use that weakness to control both sides. Europeans believe they have a far superior govt. than other countries, so they will "parent" other countries. Another way is promising them technology, medicine and education. Once again these countries they are imperializing are far from advanced than Great Britain.

4 0

1 year ago

Explain why the student nonviolent coordinating committee was dissatisfied after the march on Washington.

Mnenie [13.5K]

Answer:

They expected more from it.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Choose any of the bill of rights (amendment 1 -10 of the US constitution). Provide THREE (3) specific arguments IN FAVOR why thi

Serggg [28]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.

1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.

2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.

3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.

The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.

1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.

2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.

6 0

2 years ago

PLS HELP ME AGAIN LOL

wlad13 [49]

The answer is religious ideas because the Mandate of Heaven is essentially that of there being a Chinese emperor ruling by divine right.

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the West Indies negatively impact the British North American colonies?

astra-53 [7]

The Revolutionary War involved the West Indies. They are islands became an essential channel of gunpowder and military supplies provided by the French and Dutch for the state militias and the Continental army

6 0

1 year ago