Answer: The answer is B I think
Explanation: The fundamental orders of Connecticut set up a detailed scheme of government in which sovereign power rested with the freeman. No mention at all was made of the king. This was important because the fundamental orders established a written constitution that served as the basis of government.
Answer: Answer of 1st question
The Shay's Rebellion was a movement by the farmers of Massachusetts led by the Danial Shay who was American Revolutionary War vet.
The fight between the rebellion and the government army was limited in the Springfield. The rebels attacked the Springfield Armory in 1787 to seize the armory, but it was an unsuccessful attempt.
Basically, the protest was against the economic and civil right injustice. The Shay's rebellion demanded the more power to the central government and to form a new government.
Moreover, the reason behind for sparking off the Shay's rebellion was also the demand of Constitutional convention. There was a week national government under the Articles of Confederation. Because after getting the independence from the British monarchy, the founder fathers were not willing to form a type of central government which would held power more than the states. There was a fear of monopoly of power by the central government which would be same experience like as the British rule. So for this thinking the national government was weak under the Articles of Confederation.
Answer of 2nd question
There was a week national government under the Articles of Confederation. Because after getting the independence from the British monarchy, the founder fathers were not willing to form a type of central government which would held power more than the states. There was a fear of monopoly of power by the central government which would be same experience like as the British rule. So for this thinking the national government was weak under the Articles of Confederation.
Explanation:
The government often set up different kinds of Acts. The three ways the U.S. government enforced the Indian Removal Act was that;
- They seize
- they occupy
- they drove the inhabitant away.
<h2>Indian Removal Act.</h2>
They used the process of “allotment and assimilation” in enforcing the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson was known to be going against the Court as he decided to enforce Native Removal through the act where He sent white settler to take over the Native American land with the use of force.
Learn more about the Act from
brainly.com/question/2222812
Answer:
The political power of the Abbasids largely ended with the rise of the Buyids and the Seljuq Turks in 1258 CE. Though lacking in political power, the dynasty continued to claim authority in religious matters until after the Ottoman conquest of Egypt in 1517.
