When reading this excerpt I understood authors intentions, I bet, in full measure. As he mentioned - the war is murder, thousands of people fighting for particular idea and nothing can't stop them, neither moral issues nor ethical rules. All these people are guilties of a global crime and author at any price will not support such events. Unlikely that all of these people will be punished for their mistakes or sins they have made, but if we will talk about regular crime, such as author described in the text - this actions must be sentenced to justice.
So I choose this option :
<span>B.Paine says that war is terrible, and ordinarily nothing could have convinced him to support it. However, he also believes that if a person or group commits severe crimes against him, that party should be punished, no matter who they are.</span>
Answer:
B. It suggests that Crusoe has to justify his reluctance to sell a boy into slavery.
Explanation:
Though a bit reluctant to sell a boy into slavery, Robinson Crusoe had no other option than to sell Xury to the Portuguese sailor as he needed money. Also that he himself is not capable of taking care of anyone as he is also just a young man. And it should also be noted that it was this same Portuguese sailor who later became an important part of his life. He helped Crusoe in getting into the plantation business.
<span>B. It is taken from one solid primary source.
The method of researching is a systematic process of gathering, integrating, interpreting and presenting a collected data ruled out by the reliability and validity of the sources and elicited evidences.
A good topic should have come from a credible and solid primary source so that the study could be backed up from the former claims. </span>
Answer:
1 and 3. I just answered the question, it could of been all of the above also, it didn't say, but either way they are right
Explanation:
