Answer:
sorry if wrong tell me if im wrong and ill try to change it
Explanation:
The style of 1984 is bleak and depressing, mirroring the functional style and aesthetics of the Party, where adornment is looked down on, individuality is discouraged, and beauty and refinement are considered politically suspect. Orwell uses straightforward grammar, reflecting his belief that uncluttered language is the most honest form of communication. In an essay called “Politics and the English Language,” he states that “to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration.” For Orwell, in order to think clearly one had to be able to first write clearly, and 1984 models the clarity and concision critical to independent thought.
At the same time, the language is markedly oppressive and dull – mimicking the deadening effect of life under Party rule, where everything is ugly and gray. For example, the book’s opening is clear and straightforward, but also evokes a sense of discomfort and misery: “Winston Smith, his chin nuzzled into his breast in an effort to escape the vile wind, slipped quickly through the glass doors of Victory Mansions, though not quickly enough to prevent a swirl of gritty dust from entering along with him.” The few adjectives Orwell uses – vile, gritty – paint a bleak picture of the scene.
Answer:
B.) Will Luma speak to Fornatee and allow him back onto the team
Answer:
C.look at the prefix in-, which means “not”
Explanation:
I got it right
In the Lion and the mouse the consequence to the lion’s arrogance was that he got caught by hunters, however, he was set free by the mouse learning his lesson. In The Story of David and Goliath, Goliath was killed for underestimating David and David went on to marry the king’s daughter. However, he was not the only one who underestimated the young shepherd. The Israelites also underestimated David and made fun of him for believing that he could kill Goliath. (I’m sorry I don’t know the other story)
