Choose the best answer:
Review the argument.
Claim #1: David likes peanut butter.
Claim #2: Some people who like peanut butter are jk word.
Conclusion: David is a jk word.
Which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument?
A preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality.
Hope this helps!
Mostly latin, you can tell because some latin words are the same as English :) My teacher told us this
Answer: specify the story
Explanation:
I'll do it! when should it be done by? Also, what grade are you in?
The statement from the dissenting opinion of tinker v. des moines court decision that best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was not within the protection of the free speech clause of the first amendment is :
In cox v. Louisiana, the court clearly stated that the rights of free speech and assembly "do not mean that everyone with opinion or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place at any time
Hope this helps. C:
