Answer:
Explanation:
In a chemical reaction, the order of reaction with respect to one species is the exponent of the species in the rate law.
The experimental <em>rate law of the reaction</em> is:
![rate=k[H_3AsO_4]\cdot [I^-]\cdot[H_3O^+]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=rate%3Dk%5BH_3AsO_4%5D%5Ccdot%20%5BI%5E-%5D%5Ccdot%5BH_3O%5E%2B%5D)
That means:
-
![[H_3AsO_4]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BH_3AsO_4%5D)
, ![[I^-]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BI%5E-%5D)
, and ![[H_3O^+]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BH_3O%5E%2B%5D)
are the concentrations of the reactants
- The exponents are 1, 1, and 1.
- Thus, the order of the reaction with respect to each species is 1.
- The overall order is the sum of the exponents: 1 + 1 + 1 = 3.
In conclusion, <em>the order of reaction with respect to </em><em> is 1.</em>
I’m not sure what this question exactly means but it could be anything ig
evidence can end up transferring to the crime scene through Locard's Exchange Principle, which states that whenever two things come into contact with one another, there is an exchange of physical material A.K.A evidence. This exchange is most often done through physical contact, such as a struggle or a suspect attempting to hide evidence or alter the crime scene. It can even involve a suspect's shirt sleeve brushing against some wet paint.
