Answer:
An argument relies on a comparison of two things
Explanation:
Many arguments rely on an analogy between two or more objects, ideas, or situations. If the two things that are being compared aren’t really alike in the relevant respects, the analogy is a weak one, and the argument that relies on it commits the fallacy of weak analogy.
Analogy: a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
It helps the economy. Casinos bring people to the state which also brings in money. Food places and hotels are also built for the out of state people to stay in. It boosts the economy for that state
Dear friend (whatever name you want), I want to send my deepest condolences to you and your family during this time. Your mother was an amazing woman and she will truly be missed. If there’s anything you need i’m here for you.
Answer:
c. Deductive, analogy
Explanation:
In this scenario, the argument being made would be classified as a deductive analogy. An analogy basically compares two things together in order to explain an idea, most of the time these two things have something in common that allows that idea to be better understood. In this scenario, they are comparing a rabid dog and an unexploded bomb. Since the unexploded bomb is the object that the rabid dog is being compared to it would be considered the conclusion, and since the conclusion is being applied first in the second part of the argument you are therefore using deductive logic.
It was called the Globe Theater
