1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
2 years ago
7

Benjamin Banneker was best known as _____.

History
2 answers:
yan [13]2 years ago
4 0

that would be A my mans

Largely self-taught, Banneker was one of the first African Americans to gain distinction in science. His significant accomplishments include the successful prediction of a solar eclipse, publishing his own almanac, and the surveying of Washington, D.C. Banneker spent most of his life on his family's 100-acre farm outside Baltimore. There, he taught himself astronomy by watching the stars and learned advanced mathematics from borrowed textbooks.

Simora [160]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

a early African American intellectual

You might be interested in
Provide examples of how Bohemian writers challenged the common themes of the 1920s?
lawyer [7]
Oh nah baby this ain’t gon work I don’t have any examples
3 0
2 years ago
The Battle of Round Mountain ended in a(n) __________.
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

The answer is C pls try to give me brainliest.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Exit
Hatshy [7]
It would be "<span>D. an openness to new ideas and experiences" that is not generally an element of nationalism, since nationalism usually promotes "old" ideals about how a country and group of people should act. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
During the English Civil War (1642-1649), which combatant did the English North American colonies support
Nesterboy [21]

Answer: I think the Answer might be The english paraliment

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best explains why the Silk Road was important?
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize each of the first five presidents
    11·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLY!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Which governmental action illustrates the system of checks and balances
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these was a major reason for the rise of the modern civil rights era of the 1950's?
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the necessary and proper clause a source of ongoing debate?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain why scientists think that moon rocks and meteorites are about the same age as earth
    6·1 answer
  • Why would flatboats not work on all means of river transportation?
    14·1 answer
  • Why do you think the authors chose to
    8·2 answers
  • What is the main object of worship in the quechua religion?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!