The correct answer from each drop-down menu are the following ones:
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempst to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of <u>scientific data ,</u> which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on <u>expert opinion,</u> which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.
In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer's <u>emotions.</u> It makes <u>passionate</u> claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
The linking word "in contrast" indicates that what is about to be introduced should be the opposite to whas has been said. Consequently, as the first paragraph talks about scientific data, the second one should appeal to the opposite of that, that is, emotions and beliefs. "Passionate" is the only adjective in the examples that has a positive connotation that can be put together with the first option ("emotions").
Answer:
Who's side are Iggy and Loretta on?
They are on Max's side.
What is their plan?
Loretta tells Max that Iggy will keep Killer Kane busy while she gets Max loose. She also tells him that there are enough cops out there to start war, and they will be safe when they get out of this godforsaken place.
I believe that you should definitely set your own example by not laughing or deriding that other student. If they do something wrong, you shouldn't laugh at them or mock them, but rather try to help them. What you can do as well is ask that other student nicely to stop deriding other students because of a mistake they may have made.
Answer: Having “Pancakes” in third person omniscient may have been both a benefit and a hinderance to the story. In first person we get to know our main character on a deeper level. We get to know Jill’s true personality and how she views the world, with her cynical attitude and narrow focus, as well as her need for control and fear of losing it. With third-person omniscient, we may have been provided with how the other characters viewed Jill as she struggled in this situation, and how perhaps she didn’t hide her fear and anxiety as well as she thought. With Jill’s thoughts and feelings an open book to us in first person it made her relatable, made the focus on her, we may have lost some of that in third person. Her feeling could have been choppy and disjointed when we hopped from character to character. Instead of feeling suspense and anxiety with Jill, as in first person. We might have just felt it for her, we might not feel as connected to her as a character, we may have cringed and judged her more then move through the story with her.
Answer:
a) Are there any road salts that aren't harmful to vegetation.
b) There is a road salt that's less harmful to vegetation.
c) The type of salt.
d) The harm to the vegetation.
e) The vegetation type.
Explanation:
Sorry that's as far as i can go tonight I'm tired:(
