<span>On November 4, 1979, a group of Iranian students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, taking more than 60 American hostages. The immediate cause of this action was President Jimmy Carter’s decision to allow Iran’s deposed Shah, a pro-Western autocrat who had been expelled from his country some months before, to come to the United States for cancer treatment. However, the hostage-taking was about more than the Shah’s medical care: it was a dramatic way for the student revolutionaries to declare a break with Iran’s past and an end to American interference in its affairs. It was also a way to raise the intra- and international profile of the revolution’s leader, the anti-American cleric Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The students set their hostages free on January 21, 1981, 444 days after the crisis began and just hours after President Ronald Reagan delivered his inaugural address. Many historians believe that hostage crisis cost Jimmy Carter a second term as president</span>
The committee's recommendations were never implemented by Congress because it did not believe that all 13 states would approve the amendments.
Due to Congress's lack of confidence that all 13 states would approve the proposed Articles of Confederation revisions offered by committee chairman Pinckney in August 1786, the committee's recommendations were never implemented.
The delegates gathered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, during the Constitutional Convention to create the new Constitution that will govern the young country. The initial US Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, had many shortcomings and had left a weak central authority. The delegates were discussing and debating the new Constitution for this reason.
Charles Pinckney represented South Carolina as a delegate. Congress agreed when asked in May 1786 to appoint a committee to study the Articles. The modifications were ready on August 7, 1786, but they were never adopted. The conference at Annapolis, Maryland, is the next phase.
To know more about Constitution click here:
brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ4
I would say driving on the highway because the social contract is the act of giving up ones personal rights for the government and driving on the highway is a governmental idea. Which you accept there proposal of driving on the highway rather than through a field so to speak.