<span>In my personal opinion I do not justify the blocking measure adopted by the British government, because despite being at war, the consequences were assumed by the entire German population, men, women and children. All alike suffered the effects of hunger and a series of chronic diseases ranging from simple flu and dysentery, to more serious afflictions such as typhus, tuberculosis and scurvy. As food became scarcer, German civilians began to act instinctively to feed themselves, and in many cases this need dominated their entire lives. In the end, millions of people sought to obtain what they and their families needed to survive, committing illicit acts such as stealing and assaulting other citizens in their never-ending quest to feed themselves, that is, a loss of moral and ethical values, leaving the animal instinct of survival.</span>
Roosevelt's New Deal plans showed that he believed that <u>The </u><u>government </u><u>should </u><u>help </u><u>the </u><u>economy </u><u>without fully </u><u>controlling </u><u>it.</u>
<u />
<h3>The New Deal </h3>
- Was championed by the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
- Was meant to increase government spending in the economy to help the U.S. get out of the Great Depression.
Roosevelt believed that while the government should not control the economy entirely, it should act as a very important partner that would support it to be as best as it could be.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on the New Deal at brainly.com/question/14642503.
Three of the factors in Russia which fostered the revolution of 1917 were the impoverishment of the peasants who struggled to survive on their small plots of land and to pay the debts they owed to buy their land after the serf system was changed; many peasants who couldn't make a go of it fled to the cities and took part in the local industrial revolution but were oppressed by inadequate wages and poor working conditions and lastly WWI resulted in the poor masses in Russia being used as canon fodder in an unjust imperialist war to divide up the world differently unlike WWII which was to end the Nazi tyrrany.
The answer should be the moment inpacked a lot of people the way they lived and how they survived
