Answer: The Indian Removal Act was supported by northeasterners and southerners who had land disputes with Native Americans. It was a unitary act of displacement.
Explanation: This act was consistent with problematic ideas about Native Americans that were common in the period.
<u>The main reason was the dispute over the lands of the Native tribes. </u>
Explanation:
The governments of several states of the United States felt that the presence of the tribes was a threat to peace and security, because many Native Americans had fought against the United States in previous wars, often armed by foreign nations such as Great Britain and Spain. Other white settlers and land speculators simply wanted the land that was being occupied by the tribes. Therefore, these governments wanted all tribal lands within their borders to be placed under state jurisdiction.
A result of the Gibbo V. Ogden (1824) decision was that state could regulate commerce only within their borders. This was a landmark decision in which united state supreme that held the power to regulate interstate commerce. The landmark was considered decision with ripple effect that lasted for 1000 years.
