After the War of 1812, Americans A "gained a renewed sense of pride in their country." There were no territorial gains in the war, however it solidified Americas ability to hold off the British, and therefore increased national pride.
Jean Lafitte and his men were familiar with the area so the U.S. willing to use the services of them.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Lafitte additionally kept in touch with Governor Claiborne, offering his administrations and those of his men to guard New Orleans. He knew about the area and had more than 800 men in his direction. The British, acknowledging how significant it is have Lafitte on their side, offered Lafitte a pay off to join the British.
In any case, Lafitte denied the offer and rather cautioned the United States of the offer made by the British and speedily offered his administrations to Andrew Jackson. Afterward, as a byproduct of a legitimate exoneration for the dealers, Lafitte and his confidants helped General Andrew Jackson protect New Orleans from the British in the last clash of the War of 1812.
Without the speech I would say its a logical appeal
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
Rhetros is the right answer