Answer:
Hamilton's letter helps us to understand his commitment as the freedom of the country, but it complicates our understanding of his abolitionist position, since the letter has a more widespread than specific content in relation to African Americans.
Explanation:
Hamilton's letter reaffirms his commitment to freedom within the country. Through her I understood Hamilton's motivations to start this fight against the forces, which he believed, were oppressive and limiting for the colonies. However, the letter speaks about hope in a general way, including all citizens within America, but does not specify Hamilton's position on blacks. This within the musical complicates our understanding of Hamilton as an abolitionist, since the original letter is very specific in this regard.
Answer:
Dear diary,
Today me and Jack did something really good of the community. As we all know this year has not been good for all of us in the town and nearby. Me and Jack performed a campaign to aware people about the use of water and to save it much as it can. The situation have been tough with the water cutting near to fifty percent and the indications of further decrease. It was a tough day to stand in the heat and interacting with all these people but the feeling after the hard work was really great. I think this day will come out to be a millstone in Jack and my friendship.
Hiya,
I believe the answer is
C, the author notes that most people do not enjoy doing the research required to discover the truth.
Hope This Helps! :)
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic
