Answer: Testimonial Evidence
Explanation: Testimonial Evidence refers to an individual's account of an incident offered to prove the truth or veracity of a criminal or civil proceeding. Testimonial Evidence relies on the understanding of witnesses about what transpired at a crime scene. Hence, investigators use this to recreate series of events leading to the crime. The evidence must be relevant, material and competent before it can be used to prove or disprove a fact. Testimonial Evidence also needs no reinforcing evidence before admission by a court.
Sounds like rule of law to me. the rule of law states that everyone no matter what are held accountable to the same law. and trump was being held to the same law as any normal citizen here. hope that helped somewhat! :)
<u>Science</u> is a systematic way of learning about the world through observations and experiments that lead to a pool of knowledge.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation: </u>
The structured learning way about the universe via theories and practical scenarios to gain knowledge is called science. Physics, Engineering are some of the best examples of it. It simply presents based on proper research.
Pseudoscience is mostly the unproven strategies or theories that consider to be a scientific one. The theory refers to the group of concepts that explains something in a detailed manner. Psychology is defined as a study of one’s behavior and mentality scientifically.
Answer:
You will need to write at least a hundred words for the essays I think. As far as drawing is concerned, you can ask me for help anytime! :) As far as taking a pic, if you have Canvas, take a screenshot of your work.
Explanation:
Screenshot: Shift+ctrl+The square up in the top row with the two bars next to it. Press all at once or in a row holding them all down. Click and drag to make a square around what you want the screenshot of! :)
Answer: School Judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics based on the individual. I know this because everybody makes mistakes, and if you base a person off the mistakes they might've made in the past, your biased and unfair. From my background knowledge, I remember a show on TV called divorce court, this man was judged because of mistakes he did when he was fifteen, he didn't even know better, and he might've been battling his own mind, he didn't deserve to be judged based on his past mistakes. In conclusion, judges should not be able to hand down sentences based on the characteristics of an individual because it's biased.
Explanation:
