Answer:
The answer is operational efficiency.
Explanation:
The founder of Walmart Sam Walton created a business model that involved three strategies: volume, economies of scale, and the minimization of operating costs. Walmart can successfully offer lower prices because of the volume at which they offer products. Their margin of profit is lower than the competitor on each item but they manage to eventually create an economy of scale with this because they move much larger volumes to make up for the lower margins. Walmart now has the bargaining power to shape the supply sector to their advantage and to keep the costs of providing retail space and services low.
Authoritarianism is marked by submission to authority. It is the opposite of individualism, and democracy. In authoritarian government systems the political power is condensed into one authority figure or figures. Generally they assume power, and are not elected by the people.
A I’m pretty sure ............
Answer:
Weapons in certain locations were removed.
Explanation:
The 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty required the United States and the Soviet Union to eliminate and permanently forswear all of their nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers.
The correct answer is C. The United States and the Soviet Union held the balance of power.
Explanation
The Suez crisis was a military conflict developed in Egypt in 1956. In this conflict, the military alliance formed by the United Kingdom, France, and Israel fought against Egypt supported by the Arab League. This conflict originated because the Egyptian government wanted to nationalize control over the Suez Canal that had been under the control of France and the United Kingdom. For their part, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed this intervention because it threatened their political and economic interests, so the United States requested the withdrawal of the allies, and the Soviet Union threatened to use weapons of mass destruction on the capital cities of England and France. From the above, it can be inferred that in the Suez crisis that the great powers of the moment managed the world under their interests and wanted to keep power balanced between the two of them.