Catherine de Médici was able to "manipulate" European politics in the sixteenth century by marrying her daughters to the kings of Spain and France, since she is altering the minds of those elected through marriage.
Answer:
A. Logical flaws in Amena's counterclaim
Answer:
Similarities
1. Both documents advocated for the rights and liberty of the citizens.
2. Both documents prevented autocratic rule by ensuring the proper representation of the people.
Differences
1. The English Bill of Rights was borne out of political tensions while the US Bill of Rights was an amendment to the constitution.
2. They both differed in content. The English Bill of Rights contained information on the rights of citizens, reasons while the then Monarchs were rightful successors to the throne, and details of the ills committed by King James. The US Bill of Rights simply amended the constitution.
Explanation:
The English Bill of Rights was signed into law in the year 1689 by William III and Mary II in response to the political and religious tensions happening at the time. This Bill of Rights gave powers to the Parliament and made them a source that must be consulted before critical decisions were made by the Monarchs. It also outlined the rights of citizens.
The US Bill of Rights received its blueprint from the English Bill of Rights. It was established in 1789 as 12 amendments to the constitution. It outlined the rights of the United States citizens, one of which was the Freedom of Speech.
Answer:
is there a picture of the article or story? if so ill glady try to help
Explanation:
This is called word analysis.
When you are trying to figure out what a particular word means, you are obviously going to analyze it. Maybe you know what its root means, or you can deduce the meaning based on its prefixes and suffixes. You will probably take into consideration the context and neighboring words in the sentence as well in order to analyze it.
