Answer:
Movies and radio in the 1920s also made our country more homogeneous. Immigrants assimilate into American society over time. The media of the 1920s helped to speed the assimilation for the new Americans, as well as setting us on the path to losing our regional differences.
Explanation:
The U.S. film industry has been lagging behind over the past few years. Despite the slowed growth, the market is still projected to grow. Now, many movie producers in the industry are looking into strategic alternatives to bolster sales. Marketing and advertising movies have always been a go-to strategy for companies, but some are diving further in. Businesses are looking for other advertising alternatives, such as social media, to connect with the audience more and receive feedback. According to data compiled by IBISWorld, obtained by Deadline, the American film industry is projected to grow by a CAGR of 2% to USD 47.9 Billion by 2022. The research conducted also shows that the film industry is still growing slightly faster than the overall economy and it is projected to retain more of its revenue as profits grew by 12.6% in 2017 compared to just 10.6% in 2012. Box offices are projected to grow at a slower rate, but regardless, the market will continue to be driven forward as new players in the industry expand into movie and film production.
Answer:
Miranda rights.
Explanation:
correct me if I am wrong doing the test to
Answer:
The peculiar nature of counterinsurgency operations in Vietnam required modification of the usual concepts of hospital usage in a combat area. There was no "front" in the tradition of World War II. The Amy checkered the countryside with base camps. Although any one of these might become a battlefield, the base camp was relatively secure unless it was under attack. Semipermanent, air-conditioned, fully equipped hospitals were constructed at a number of these camps. In contrast to World War II and the Korean War, the hospital did not follow the advancing army in direct support of tactical operations. All Army hospitals in Vietnam, including the MUST (Medical Unit, Self-contained, Transportable) units, were fixed installations with area support missions. Since there was no secure road network in the combat area of Vietnam, surface evacuation of the wounded was almost impossible. Use of the five separate companies and five detachments of ground ambulances sent to Vietnam was limited largely to such functions at base camps as transportation between the landing strip and the hospital or the routine transfer of patients between neighboring hospitals when roads were secure. Air evacuation of the injured became routine.
Getting the casualty and the physician together as soon as possible is the keystone of the practice of combat medicine. The helicopter achieved this goal as never before. Of equal importance was that the Medical Department was getting the two together in a hospital environment equipped to meet almost any situation. The degree of sophistication of medical equipment and facilities everywhere in Vietnam permitted Army physicians to make full use of their training and capability. As a result, the care that was available in Army hospitals in Vietnam was far better than any that had ever been generally available for combat support. The technical development of the helicopter ambulance, a primitive version of which had been used to a limited extent in the Korean War, the growth of a solid body of doctrine on air evacuation procedures, and the skill, ingenuity, and courage of the aircraft crewmen and medical aidmen who put theory into practice in a hostile and dangerous environment made possible the hospitalization and evacuation system that evolved in Vietnam. The system worked effectively because it was compatible with the characteristics of warfare in that country.
Explanation:
A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
RIGHT The British government could not prevent settlement of American Indian lands.
<h3>What is
the British government?</h3>
The United Kingdom is an island nation in northwest Europe composed of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. England is the birthplace of Shakespeare and The Beatles, and its city, London, is an internationally influential financial and cultural centre. England is also home to the Neolithic Stonehenge, the Roman resort of Bath, and the centuries-old institutions of Oxford and Cambridge.
The United Kingdom is a unitary state with devolution ruled by a parliamentary democracy under a constitutional monarchy in which the monarch, now Queen Elizabeth II, is the head of state and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, presently Boris Johnson, is the head of government.
To know more about British government follow the link:
brainly.com/question/3907413
#SPJ4
