<span>
Restorative justice philosophical framework and a series of programs for the criminal justice system that emphasize the need to repair the harm done to crime victims through a process of negotiation, mediation, victim empowerment, and</span> Reparation<span>.</span>
Most likely, yes.
Different cultures value different ideas, different upbringings and have different value systems in general. All of these differences lead to different people in terms of their preferences and choices. Because all this exists, we can very safely say that a personal identity would also be different in a different culture.
"Each congressional party has become more homogeneous, and the distance between parties has increased." This represents the trend of party polarization over the past three decades.
Political party polarization refers to cases in which an individual's stance on a given policy or issue is strictly defined by their identification with a particular political party.
The reasons for the rise in party polarization include political parties, redistricting, the public's political ideology, and the role mass media in spreading the information.
The congressional party are creating programs and policies that shape public opinions. Once the political party win the elections, they form the government and its policies are implemented.
Hence, over the past three decades, each congressional party has become more homogeneous, and the distance between parties has increased. This includes the expanding number of candidates in the party.
To learn more about the party polarization here:
brainly.com/question/11319360
#SPJ4
Answer:
Not successful these days, with the lengthy appeals process and available parole.
Explanation:
I used to be against it as an individual, when once you were sentenced, you did your time. If you were sentenced to life, prison was where you died. I tend to lean towards the death penalty, depending on the crime, of course. In my opinion, our judicial system, always has room for improvements. Hope this helps.
Well, two answers are very close and in a way both correct:
Having the freedom to do whatever someone wants
<span>Having the freedom to make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context
I would say the second one is better- one is rarely really free to do everything, as one is limited by resources etc, but autonomy would still mean being able to </span><span><span>make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context.</span> </span>
