Answer:
not use the information because it may be politically motivated
Explanation:
If you're trying to write an unbiased paper, you probably want to avoid "information" published by one political party or the other. If you can get independent verification of the "information", then it probably can be used. In any event, you need to recognize the agenda being promoted by the source.
Answer:
To allow the reader to connect to the story and to gain the reader's attention.
Explanation:
So you look more professional and to help ease anxiety for actually presenting
Answer:
B. He feels that he and Hillary were equals and that they could not have climbed Everest without eachother's help.
Answer:
There were more or less 100 people at the theater.
In short, we broke up.
I assume he´s not coming.
Explanation:
The Hedges are in bold.
The Gricean Maxims are:
Maxim of Quantity: a contribution should be as informative as necessary for the exchange.
Maxim of quality: do not say what you believe to be false or something of which you lack adequate evidence.
Maxim of relation: provide only relevant information.
Maxim of manner: avoid vagueness and ambiguity, be brief and orderly.
The first two sentences infringe the Maxim of Quantity because the hedges reflect a lack of detail in the information provided, meaning that information necessary for the exchange is missing.
The third sentence infringes the Maxim of quality because an assumption is information based on no evidence.