Joseph Stalin established the goal of collecting all the land under the state power. This is called collectivization and it meant that privately owned land was taken away from the owners and given to the state. His second goal was industrialization of production.
<span>A perspective that seeks to encourage people to view other cultures through their own lens is called "cultural relativism". Cultural relativism includes the belief that there is no one culture that is better or worse than another. The cultures are just different because of the mores and values that developed through the history, beliefs, and development of each culture.</span>
Answer:
3. He should encourage audience participation by asking questions or requesting examples.
Explanation:
When an audience is not engaged in a speech it means that they are not interested in the contents of the speech or rather the way contents have been presented.
The purpose of a speech is to impart knowledge to a large group of people if the audience is not interested in the speech then the main function of a speech is not fulfilled. The speaker should not ignore the speech or provide additional data but instead, encourage the audience to participate. This would involve the audience in the speech.
Hence the answer is 3. He should encourage audience participation by asking questions or requesting examples.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
