Is that the full question?
The correct answer is C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure.
Mexican citizens had conflicting views of Porfirio Diaz’s rule because he limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure
Porfirio Díaz (1830-1915) was the Mexican dictator that ruled the country from 1876 to 1911. He was a controversial figure in Mexican politics. On one side, he was an unyielding dictator and suppressed people's liberties, but on the other hand, he had the vision to modernize México and heavily invested in the construction of railroads to connect the country and to improve transportation and trade.
The other options of the question were A) He had a popular agenda of liberal reform but he did not institute policies that led to a lasting change. B) He led Mexico to military victories but he did not achieve great social and economic stability. C) He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. D) He made strides in reducing the economic gap but he was a harsh and unyielding dictator.
Answer:
Missouri Territory was authorized to organize for admission to the Union as a state without restriction as to slavery.
Explanation:
Hope this helped!
Answer:
A. It was the result of political pressure by business interests in the eastern United States.
Answer choices are:
A) Democratically elected governments became well supported.
B) People lost faith in democratically elected governments.
C) Authoritarian dictators were removed due to their failure to deal with
economic problems.
D) Most Latin American people supported ruling oligarchies.
Correct answer choice is:
C) Authoritarian dictators were removed due to their failure to deal with
economic problems.
Latin American Countries were worst affected by the great Depression. The increase of ideology additionally became apparent in Latin American countries within the Nineteen Thirties because of the great Depression. Fascist governments were one of the results of a need for nationalism. Nationalization took over the natural resources and strengthened the government control over economy.
