Answer:
the entire supply chain (hope this helps) pls i need one more brainly to rank up
Answer:
The cost recorded for the equipment=$229,550
Explanation:
The total recorded cost of the automatic equipment has to include the purchase cost and other additional associated costs that come with the equipment. This can be expressed as;
T=P+A
where;
T=total cost
P=purchase cost/invoice cost
A=additional costs(electrical work cost+delivery cost+sales tax+repair cost)
In our case;
T=unknown
P=$190,000
A=(20,000+4,000+13,700+1,850)=$39,550
replacing;
T=190,000+39,550=229,550
The total cost=$229,550
The cost recorded for the equipment=$229,550
Answer:
This long of a question for onmly 10 points? But ill answe rit anyway. 48000299 the 200
Explanation:
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.
Answer:
Explanation:
I think it's A.
You should always question the source. You might be lucky and discover what they've not said about their product. Or you may discover it is simply not true.
A few years back (many in fact), there was a product on the market call Laetrile. It was produced from peach pits. It has an overwhelming popularity that Sloan Kettering (the Cancer Clinic in New York -- the oldest and largest one in the world), spent some of their needed grant money to test Laetrile. The results -- nothing. Imagine what happened to those who marketed this product. Word got around. People with Cancer are pretty desperate. They and their loved ones will try anything.
But the facts on the internet help to dispel this kind of thing.
