Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
The approximate size of the initial population of the rats five years before is 89. With average of 1.4 growth rate per year, it accumulated to 478 rats over the 5 years time.
Answer: d) think at the margin.
Explanation:
A rational person is defined as some who makes decision with the intelligent thinking rather being emotional .This result usually results in sensible outcomes.
According to the Ten principles of Economics,it is supposed that a rational person tends to think intelligently and would prefer to make minute changes in the resources while taking decision so that optimal rate can be maintained and additional action can be further thought.
Other option are incorrect because purchasing items from smaller organization, sunk rate and average cost product equalizing with the price is not the decision ability of a rational person
Answer:
D. Break your report into modules and put highly detailed information in an appendix.
Explanation:
According to the question above, it is observed that when writing the report on new regulations that affect your company, the main objective is to reach the executives, who are busy and will read your report quickly, so the ideal is that the report is written with highly detailed information in an appendix and the report is divided into modules, with the aim of executives to access the most important information and the parts that most interest them more quickly.
Therefore, the report must be complete and contain all information about the subject in question, as it should also reach members of the secondary and tertiary public, they will probably read more slowly and carefully.
