B: recruit Achilles son, neoptolemus I think that’s the answer
One major difference between Noah’s and Rector’s historical interpretation of the War on Poverty is Noah described poverty as a societal failure rather than personal moral failings.
Explanation:
In the interpretation of the war on poverty Noah and Rector does not possess same thinking. As Noah thought that poverty is a social curse in which one has nothing to do. War is one of the cause of financial crisis that led to poverty in the society. People used to lose their property, money everything in the war.
On the other side Rector do not think that poverty is a social curse. He thought that poverty is caused to anyone due to the failings of one's personal moral values. He thought poverty can be replenished if anyone's want. It has no power to be heavy on one's life.
When Americans think of African-Americans in the DEEP SOUTH before the Civil War, the first image that invariably comes to mind is one of slavery. However, many African-Americans were able to secure their freedom and live in a state of semi-freedom even before slavery was abolished by war. FREE BLACKS lived in all parts of the United States, but the majority lived amid slavery in the American South. According to the 1860 U.S. Census, there were 250,787 free blacks living in the South in contrast to 225,961 free blacks living everywhere else in the country including the Midwest and the Far West; however, not everyone, particularly free blacks, were captured by census takers. In the upper south, the largest population of free blacks were in Maryland and Virginia; in the mid-Atlantic, the largest population of free blacks was in Philadelphia.
Answer:
Because its in our dna. It’s been with us for years. And the signs of the end of the world described in the Bible is coming true. And because of preachers around the world spreading the good news of the Bible.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
unlike democrats Republicans want less govermant control
