Gezon and kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer north americans is

1 answer:

6 0

Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is "an adaptation to poverty".

A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.

You might be interested in

List three countries that did not belong to either alliance Someone please help please

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Spain, Greece, and the Netherlands

Explanation:

The maps show us the alliances that existed before World War I. We can see that Triple Entente (painted in black) was composed of Great Britain, France, and Russia. They made an informal agreement, and these countries entered the war as Allied Powers. The map shows that the other alliance (hatched) was the Triple Alliance composed of Germany, Italy, and the Austria-Hungarian empire. They made Central powers in the war.

The counties presented in white on the map are those that did not belong to any alliance. The three countries that did not belong to any alliance which we can see are:

Spain – Spain did not ally with anyone, and it managed to remain neutral during the war. The King and prime minister did not want to get involved and wanted to try to benefit at the end of the war from the winner, no matter who it was. However, they did not and they had many economic problems. Their neutrality continued but ended in the Spanish Civil War
Greece – Greece had no previous alliances before the war. They also wanted to remain neutral but did not manage to do so. The King and prime minister had different ideas, and there was disagreement. They entered the war in 1917, on the side of the Allies.
The Netherlands – the Netherlands had neutral international affairs before the war and made no alliances, as seen by the map. Despite them being in the west, in the middle of the countries affected by the war, they managed to stay neutral during the whole war. The army guarded the border and there were mines on the coast to protect the land. They were also bombed and attacked from both sides during the war (allegedly by accident). Not everyone in the country wanted to remain neutral, but the Netherlands endured.

5 0

3 years ago

Maryland any individual under the age of _______ is required by law to wear a seat belt or be restrained in a child safety seat,

malfutka [58]

The answer to your answer is 13

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why is it called the 'Roaring 20s'

Inessa05 [86]

Because of the exuberant freewheeling popular culture of the decade

5 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Define the concept myth in the context of Religion

Sauron [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The idea that the principal function of a myth is to provide a justification for a ritual was adopted without any great attempt to make a case for it. At the beginning of the 20th century, many scholars thought of myths in their earliest forms as accounts of social customs and values.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An effective means of countering the intimidation tactic is to ignore it. a. True b. False

marishachu [46]

I know this one!!!!!
THE ANSWER IS TRUE

8 0

4 years ago