Can you make this question more...explanatory?
The concept of a good argument is of course quite vague, if
an argument has only one or more false premises, then it is not a good
argument. Unless the premises of an argument are all true, then it would have
no reason to accept to accept its conclusion. In my line of my work In Home Health
Care there is always a good argument to go on.
Answer:
Petrified Forest National Park
Explanation:
hoped it helped!
Base on the behavior of Carlos, the best approach that will
explain the behavior that he has shown would empathy altruism hypothesis. This
is where a person has the ability of feeling empathy in other people and tries
to put themselves in their situation, where in they try to be more
understanding and tries to share the same emotion that the person would feel
because of the situation that he or she is in. It is also with this, it makes a
person help the other party without expecting anything from return and helping
them because he or she wants to and not because he or she is expecting anything
or is only obliged to do it. It is seen from Carlos actions as he helps the
woman who has been begging for alms and tries to put himself into her shoes
where he felt pain into seeing her go through in that situation.
Answer:
Relevant biomechanical principles and movement techniques.
Explanation:
The answer is relevant biomechanical principles and movement techniques because they are evaluating a person's movements.
