For the first one, it’s during the pre-trial, a judge selects a sentence. During the trial, a jury decides if a crime has been committed. The second one is probate court if someone wants to get a permit. The third one is unruly behavior and delinquent behavior. For the fourth, a juvenile will be sent to a youth detention center as a result. For the fifth, the defendant is the person who goes on trail for potentially committing a felony or misdemeanor. For the sixth, it’s obeying the rules. For the seventh, it must be unanimous. For the eighth, the court catnapping an attorney. For the ninth, the top three. For the tenth, they are appointed by superior courts. For the eleventh, unacceptable offenses. For the twelfth, the most serious cases. For the fourteenth, the second and third answer. The last one is one should ask an adult or friend to solve the dispute.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Participant observation is when an individual takes an active role in the culture and society they are studying.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When an individual chooses to involve himself actively in the operations of society in order to observe them closely and understand the nuances of each of the processes, he can be said to be carrying out participant observation.
- In this type of observation, the participant gets to become a part of the process that he is studying and understand it from within.
Answer:
A) China.
Explanation:
The Open Door policy by John Hay was expressed in the series of notes aimed to avoid the potential threat of dividing China among various sphere of influence by nations primarily by Russia, France, Germany, and Great Britain. Therefore, protection of equal privileges between these trading countries and to support China in its territorial and administrative integrity. Hay claimed that ensuring fair access to trade would favor the American economy, and he hoped the Open Door would also avoid conflicts between China's forces.
Answer:
Multiple causes took place that eventually caused many colonists to go against Great Britain.
Explanation:
By 1774, the year leading up to the Revolutionary War, there were many causes that continued to pile up. Parliament had been passing laws placing taxes on the colonists in America. There had been the Sugar Act in 1764, the Stamp Act the following year, and a variety of other laws that were meant to get money from the colonists for Great Britain. The colonists didn't like these laws.
Great Britain was passing these laws because of the French and Indian War, which had ended in 1763. That war, which had been fought in North America, left Great Britain with a huge debt that had to be paid. Parliament said it had fought the long and costly war to protect its American subjects from the powerful French in Canada. Parliament said it was right to tax the American colonists to help pay the bills for the war.
Most colonists disagreed. Parliament was elected by people living in England, and the colonists felt that lawmakers living in England could not understand the colonists' needs. The colonists felt that since they did not take part in voting for members of Parliament in England they were not represented in Parliament. So Parliament did not have the right to take their money by imposing taxes. "No taxation without representation" became the American rallying cry.
