Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Edwin Sutherland would consider 'group association' as the underlying cause of deviance.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In the discipline of criminology, the concept of 'group association' is deemed to be utterly important. It is so because 'group association' has been observed to be a major cause behind most criminal activities that take place.
- The influence that is evident on members of certain groups due to the ideology they bear is often the reason behind individuals who come in contact with such groups becoming criminals.
Answer: section 8 article 1
Explanation:
The answer is C. Electors were decided by the popular vote of citizens
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
