1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alla [95]
3 years ago
11

Why did some Americans oppose U.S. expansion?

History
2 answers:
uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Because the economy of the US was weak

Explanation:

Because the economy of the US was weak

lakkis [162]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

While Americans in general wanted the country to expand, not all Americans agreed with this sentiment. Many Americans did not believe that the country should expand. They gave several reasons for this. Some Americans believed that expansion was problematic for Native Americans. They believed that Native Americans deserved to continue living in their ancestral areas. Another  reason was the fact that many people believed that in order for America to expand, other nations needed to suffer. This was the case with countries such as Mexico.

You might be interested in
Who knows me like a saucy boy​
victus00 [196]

Answer:

me and you are just too fresh

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In this lesson, you learned that the Roman republic was the first time a country used elected officials to represent the people’
almond37 [142]

It all began when the Romans overthrew their Etruscan conquerors in 509 B.C.E. Centered north of Rome, the Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years.

Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. A republic is quite different from a democracy, in which every citizen is expected to play an active role in governing the state.

6 0
3 years ago
If you know DMX (earl simmons) what is your favorite quote from and and what does it mean to you. (Any amount of sentences and m
Shtirlitz [24]
“With the lord behind us they’re ain’t nothing we can’t do” that quote resonates with me because you don’t see a whole of of artists now a days talk about the lord like that and also when dmx also said how if he was to die now he knows he lived a great life which to me shows how much of a humble person
8 0
2 years ago
How did your analysis of the political cartoon further your interpretation of reconstruction? Explain your
-Dominant- [34]

An excellent political cartoon provokes discussion on current affairs while simultaneously attempting to persuade you to agree with the cartoonist's viewpoint. The finest political cartoonists have the power to influence your opinion on a subject without you even recognizing it.

Cartoons offer comprehensible and quick criticism and analysis of current events since they may condense news and opinion into a caricature. In contrast to traditional modes of communication, cartoons constitute a distinctive sort of journalism. The pictures can powerfully interpret the news of the day. Political cartoons may have a significant regulating and critiquing role in society when done well. Political cartoons may also entertain while offering interesting takes on the news, which can help the process of opinion development and decision-making.

Exaggeration, symbolism, labeling, comparison, and irony are five of the most popular persuasive strategies employed by cartoonists, therefore we decided to concentrate on them. Here is a quick description of each method: Exaggeration - In order to convey a point, cartoonists will exaggerate a person's or an object's physical attributes.

Learn more about political cartoons:

brainly.com/question/1545458

#SPJ9

6 0
1 year ago
How did the French Revolution differ from the American Revolution? Given their different outcomes, should the French Revolution
vlabodo [156]

Answer: French Revolution were more violient!

Explanation:

While the American Revolution took place slowly and requesting the King of English to negotiate with them, the French Revolution were more violient..... killing the King, senetors, and the nobels. In my opinion, it is more than just a violient; it's more like a GENOCIDE!

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What role did camels play in the distribution of goods in Africa?
    15·2 answers
  • What happened along the United States-Canadian border during the Embargo Act of 1807?
    13·1 answer
  • The great awakening was a movement that reflected a renewed interest in __________.
    7·1 answer
  • Who plays the part of an adjudicator and administrator in a court case? The plays the part of an adjudicator as well as an admin
    8·1 answer
  • What happened when China's Cultural Revolution swept through Tibet?
    14·1 answer
  • Why was Elizabeth I one of the greatest English rulers in history
    9·1 answer
  • Isolationism ______.
    5·2 answers
  • What caused the Great Sioux War in 1876?
    13·2 answers
  • How did technology benefit one group over another
    15·1 answer
  • The most important difference between Judaism and Christianity lies in
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!