Answer:Job satisfaction
Explanation:Job satisfaction measures how content or not content people are with their day to day jobs.
This depends on various factors such wages, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, age etc.
These factors can contribute to job satisfaction or dissatisfaction for example Intrinsic motivation, when someone works in a job that aligns well with what drives them in life or a job that aligns with their values they are very likely to be satisfied.
Some people also need things like being rewarded for the work they have done well which may give them satisfaction.
Employers can play the role as much as individuals play the role in job satisfaction by rewarding their employees , increasing their wages .
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
The number of black slaves was less. The population as a whole of black slaves grew. A lot of the soil was bad from over-planting so there was less of a demand for slaves thus some would become free.<span />
Answer:
A, but this question is very heavily based on your morals.
Explanation:
Hope this is the right Calderon your talking about lol.
Calderón served as National President of the party, Federal Deputy, and Secretary of Energy in Vicente Fox's cabinet. He served in the cabinet of the previous administration until he resigned to run for the presidency and secured his party's nomination.
