In the early 1900s, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People strongly pushed for federal legislation to: A. ban the practice of lynching.
Lynching refers to the practice of a mob killing of a certain group of individual. This method often used in order to intimidate activists that are disrupting the position of those who are in power who had a connection with underground criminal organizations.
I think the electoral college should possibly be reformed instead of abandoning it.
<h3>What is the electoral college?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the people that have to cast votes for the selection of the president and the Vice in the United States of America.
The process is old and ancient due to the the method of selection. It would be best if it was reformed.
Read more on the electoral college here;
brainly.com/question/7483395
#SPJ1
Answer:
option a is the correct answer
In my opinion, George Washington's Farewell Address was a fair and clear warning against political parties/alliances. The reason being is because, having all these alliances and political parties would cause a war. If everyone stated their opinions, and someone doesn't like it, then they will fight about it until the conflict is resolved. Republicans formed a number of societies and clubs throughout the nation, which spread criticism of Washington's political decisions. This caused the birth of the Republican Party after Thomas Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet. Washington was against the Federalists which caused a little conflict with the Republican Party. Further more, more evidence provides that Washington's address was a fair warning, due to the fact that more conflict grew in his later term of presidency. Battles raged in the press, attacking one's political views. All in all, i would say that Washington's Farewell Address was a fair, and clear warning. It was correct in my opinion. hope this helped, have an amazing day :)<span />
<span>This change happened gradually. Quakers were some of the first people in the Americas to own slaves. However, objections were brought up by Dutch Quakers in the 18th century that changed the Christian sect's outlook on owning slaves.
From these objections, Quakers gradually stopped owning slaves and became some of the most vocal abolitionists. The Quaker biblical justification was in the verse Matthew 7:12 which stated that Christians had a responsibility to adhere to a higher standard of living morally. The Quakers did not believe owning slaves was a part of living up to these standards.</span>
