Question

Help me, please!! this is due in 3 hours and I have no idea what to say please help write Health care costs in the United States are on the rise. Some people say that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care. Others say it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. Examine editorials from both sides of the argument. Then, write a five-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast each argument in terms of objectivity and the types of evidence presented. Evaluate and explain how the sources use effective evidence to support their claims.

Answer 1

Answer:

Some solid sources:

The Case for Universal Healthcare article from AMSA (Pros and cons)

WHO Arguing For UH Coverage article ( very pro UHC) Effective evidence- vast research on several different countries

Economics of Healthcare Harvard article (This source covers how UHC is too expensive, among other pros and cons)

Urban pros and cons of single payer healthcare article(A source with pros and cons)

All pdfs accessible online

Explanation:

These should be good sources of information. Intro and Conclusion are two paragraphs. For the other three, I'd make one discussing pros and cons of UHC regarding cost. How it saves money in the long run vs. how expensive it is initially. Another one about accessibility, how it opens up access to care vs. how it worsens quality of care because of shifted focus. Third paragraph I'd talk about the validity of each resource, how their studies were conducted, how much of their information was objective fact, if evidence could have compounding factors, etc.

Conclude by outlining the pros and cons of each possibility and reiterate the complexity of the debate.

For Questioning of objectivity, you could look at possible bias, look closely at where they cite information and what those studies entail.

I hope this set up helps. :)