The word that indicates you are approaching motivational blindness is <u>willfulness</u>.
Motivational blindness is the tendency not to notice when others act against the interests of the organization. The employee in this case does not work according to the guidelines and standards you expect, but the employer ignores this fact. Because these employees, even if they are wrong, will bring great benefits to the company.
An extreme version of moral myopia is called moral blindness. For example, we may obscure ethical issues by focusing too much on other aspects of the situation, such as pleasing our professor or boss or hitting our sales goals.
A ``moral blind spot'', therefore, refers to the psychological prejudices and limitations we have as individuals and as a community that prevent us from being aware of flaws and contradictions in our moral judgments, behaviors, and social practices.
Learn more about Motivational blindness here :brainly.com/question/27747662
#SPJ4
Answer: Concept of the past, present and future
Explanation:
In addition to the existing incorporating seven dimensions of
sexual orientation into his model of sexual orientation, Klien had the concept of the events in the past, presently happening and what would occur in the future.
A deductive argument is one that the arguer wants to be deductively valid, that really is, to provide a guarantee that the conclusion is correct if the premises are correct.
This principle may alternatively be put as follows: in a deductive argument, the premises are designed to give such strong evidence for the conclusion that, if the premises are true, the conclusion cannot be wrong. A valid (deductively) argument is one in which the premises successfully ensure the conclusion. If a valid argument has true premises, it is also said to be sound. All arguments are either valid or invalid, and either sound or unsound; there is no such thing as being partially valid.
Therefore, the answer is deductive argument.
To know more about deductive argument click here:
brainly.com/question/1803030
#SPJ4
<span>Explorer Vasco da Gam</span>
Answer:
The answer is stereotype threats.
Explanation:
Stereotype threats refer to a person feels susceptible to conforming to stereotypes. For this reason, older people in the example who hadn't been subjected to ageisn (discrimination based on age) showed better memory skills, as they didn't want to conform to older people's stereotypical ideas about memory.