When Ashley Johnson’s male co-workers make unwelcome comments to her about her body and frequently tell sexual jokes when she is around even though she has been vocal to them that it’s comfortable for her, then it appears that Ms. Johnson is experiencing hostile environment sexual harassment.
This example is still surprisingly present in the real world.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. A judge could throw out the teen's confession unless the officer complies with the ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
Explanation:
Miranda v. Arizona is a ruling of the United States Supreme Court from 1966. The case established the current practice whereby a suspect is required to read his or her rights (the so-called Miranda rights) without exception, which state the right to before a preliminary investigation of the suspect has begun.
That was the decision in Ernesto Miranda's trial. Miranda was arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and sexual assault of an 18-year-old girl on prima facie evidence. After two hours of questioning, Miranda signed the confession. However, he had never been informed of the possibility of meeting a legal adviser or of being silent, and that his confession could not be used against him. During the trial, Miranda's attorney, Alvin Moore, argued that confession would therefore not apply in court. Moore's objection was rejected and Miranda was sentenced to a lengthy prison sentence. The Arizona Supreme Court also upheld the ruling.
The United States Supreme Court, by a vote of 5 to 4, ruled that, due to the Fifth and Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, no confession would be valid unless the suspect was informed of his rights. The Fifth Amendment states that no one can be compelled to testify against himself and the Sixth Addendum secures access to a lawyer. Ernesto Miranda's judgment was overturned, but he was later sentenced to prison for the same case, based on other evidence.
Answer:
This is not a question. can you give me more feedback on what you need to be answered?
Explanation:
<span>She fears reprisal, and when she is in the court preparing to tell the truth about Abigail, she ends up showing signs of being manipulated. Her testimony also shows that she finds many things threatening, and these threats cause her testimony to be highly inconsistent.</span>
Members of a group can choose what is good or terrible for themselves under a direct democracy system. Citizens have the power to decide on policy initiatives without the representation of legislators, and they have the power.
Every every legislation, bill, or matter of justice is put to a vote by the entire populace in a direct democracy.
Every eligible voter in ancient Athens was forced to cast a ballot on every topic, making the city a model of direct democracy.
Hence, most laws should be passed through popular initiatives or ballot referendums. In the form of governance based on direct democracy.
<h3 /><h3>Describe indirect democracy using an example.</h3>
- Representative democracy is another name for indirect democracy. It is the political system where representatives act in the parliament on behalf of the people and communicate their concerns.
- America, India, Canada, and the United Kingdom are the four nations with indirect democracy.
To learn about more indirect democracy, visit:
brainly.com/question/1084393
#SPJ4
