Answer:
He had a better understanding of the terms than Nanette.
Explanation:
With Nanette, she only used a textbook definition. All she did was highlight the definitions she found in the textbook.
With Nathan, he didn't just stop at knowing the textbook definitions. He thought about its application in his life, relating each defined term to his personal life experiences. He then went the extra mile of relating them to other concepts in the text book.
This means he had a broad understanding of the terms both on a personal level and in relation to other concepts in the chapter. The way he processed and understood the terms will make him recall better in an essay exam.
No I would say that neither are good but Jones at least didn't use whips or stuff like that. Napoleon tried stealing ideas from other people and killed lots of animals.
I hope this helped a little.
Answer:
hope u get the answer
Explanation:
When you act in a bold way, you're taking some kind of risk; you could be risking physical danger, embarrassment, or your reputation. Whatever bold actions you take, they are confident and fearless. The adjective bold can also be used to describe a particular typeface that is thick, dark, and confident.
Answer:
Shakespeare is a strong writer regardless. He does not fully develop his ideas so the reader can have the "right" imagery in their minds. Shakespeare needs more work on scenes and stage.
Explanation:
Shakespeare is being critiqued. He is a good old writer but however lacks some development.
