Answer:
The process cost summary is given below.
A-Total Material Cost = $22,500
B-Total Conversion costs = $95,625 (45,625+50,000)
C-Units transferred out = 40,000
D-Ending Inventory = 10,000
E-Equivalent units of material = 45,000
F-Equivalent units of conversion costs = 42,500
G-Equivalent cost per unit of material = $0.5 (A/E)
H-Equivalent cost per unit of conversion costs = $ 2.25 (B/F)
I-Equivalent cost per unit = $2.75 (G+H)
J-Cost of inventory transferred = $ 110,000 (I*C)
K-Cost Of Ending Inventory = $ 8,125 (H*(F-C) + (5000*0.5))
I think the correct answer to this would be:
“A health report showing eating pizza reduces stress”
<span>If health news about pizza reducing stress would come
out, people’s willingness to buy pizza would definitely increase. This is
because of the additional positive reinforcer, reducing stress, associated with
the great taste of pizza that people would definitely buy this.</span>
The other pervasive institutional consideration which may influence pay inequality include: technological advancement, globalization, wage-setting institutional changes. In a persuasive speech, the discourse will focus on the reasons for supporting your specific purpose statement. Read below about persuasive institutional consideration strategies.
<h3>What are persuasive strategies?</h3>
The persuasive strategies are logos, ethos and pathos. The peak effective persuasive communication usually has a mix of all three strategies. Logos uses logic or reason to reach a conclusion, while ethos depends upon the credibility of the author or speaker.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about persuasive strategies: brainly.com/question/24450505
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is: C) If Jack does not accept the $100,000, there is a valid contract for the sale of the business, without a non-competition clause.
Explanation:
Non competition clause (NCC) is a legal contract that binds one party to not work for or start a rival company (in the same trade) that will compete against the other party.
In this case, Jack said he would probably agree to sign a NCC if they paid him $100,000 more, but he never said he would sign for sure the NCC. So Jack can refuse to sign the NCC and reject the extra $100,000. The selling contract would still be valid, it was never stated that if no NCC was signed, then the contract would be dismissed.
I would say that the decision making conditon in this instance would be to offer a reward to prospective car buyers so as to attract them to a vehicle which will cost them less and also to compete with other car dealers in trying to win over the prospective clients.
