Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
Answer:
x = 1.4 (or 21/15)
Step-by-step explanation:
12x - 15 = 6 - 3x
+3x +3x
-----------------------
15x - 15 = 6
+15 +15
-----------------------
15x = 21
/15 /15
----------------------
x = 21/15 or
x = 1.4
The correct answer is that there is more variability in the heights of the volleyball team members.
The mean absolute deviation shows us how spread out the data is, so the larger the mean absolute deviation the higher the variability.
Both teams have players that are 76 inches tall, so the last two statements cannot be true.
Vertex form uses the following formula:
Identify the values of h and k in your function:
The vertex is found with the following point:
The vertex will be found at
(-5, -28).
