<span>The perfect right of kings or heavenly right is a political and religious tenet of legal and political authenticity. It declares that a ruler is liable to no natural expert, inferring the privilege to govern specifically from the will of God. The lord is in this way not subject to the will of his kin, the gentry, or some other bequest of the domain</span>
C. his comparison of moral courage to bravery in battle and intelligence
(Not sure, but I hope this helps)
Answer:
A. The proposed measures would be unconstitutional. The goal of the electoral colleges was to avoid a dictatorship. However, in modern America, such concept is completely out of date. To that extent, changing the way the electoral college operates would need a change in the constitution itself.
B. The government might modify the constitution, or a section of the constitution dealing with the electoral college, to better reflect current American requirements. Our founding fathers actually proposed that the constitution be changed on a regular basis in order to accommodate these new-age principles.
C. A possible candidate would appeal to the masses and would be more population leaning than state leaning; states and cities with larger populations would receive more attention than more rural places; and more democratic and liberal leaning politicians would have a huge advantage because large cities and populations are their core demographic.
Explanation:
The Sugar Act was created in 1764.
